Legal Opinion
Fuhrman v. American National Building & Loan Ass'n
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 23, 1932No. Docket No. 8535PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAMBERSON, J., pro tem.
The respondent brought action against the appellant, American National Building and Loan Association, a corporation, and the other appellants as directors thereof, to recover the sum of $2,500, being the amount of a first payment made by respondent on a subscription for 100 shares of the “guarantee capital stock” of the appellant corporation, and prayed for the cancellation of the subscription agreement upon the ground that he had been induced by fraudulent representations of the appellants and their agents to sign the subscription agreement. Judgment was entered in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Morgan v. . SkiddyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- McMahon v. GrimesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Beeman v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Churchill v. St. George Development Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Bystrom v. VillardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lobdell v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Gormly v. DickinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- In Re SnyderUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 1989
- In Re ScrogginCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Travelers Insurance Co. v. Olson (In Re Olson)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.