Legal Opinion

Bertelsen v. Harris

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 11, 2008No. 06-36020PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge BEA; Dissent by Judge MILAN D. SMITH, JR.

BEA, Circuit Judge:

We are called on to decide whether attorney misconduct towards clients, involving violations of rules of professional conduct binding on the attorney, requires forfeiture of the attorneys’ fees paid to them when, after all righteous furor is vented, the fees were eminently reasonable for the result produced.

Jeffrey and Amy Bertelsen, their now-defunct company Bertelsen Food & Gas, Inc., and Jeffrey Bertelsen’s parents Dr. Richard and Janice Jo Bertelsen (“Appellants”), appeal the district court’s judgment after a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chun He Li v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. Kathleen Lentini v. California Center for the Arts, Escondido Alan Corbin Randy Vogel, and Does 1-10Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Eriks v. DenverWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Anne P. Hendry v. Francis J. Pelland and Sadur, Pelland & Rubinstein, P.C.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  5. Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against GillinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bode & Grenier, L.L.P. v. KnightDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  2. Bigsby v. Barclays Capital Real Estate, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
  3. Asa Williams, Jr. v. Carmen Mays-WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  4. BANDYOPADHYAY v. 1District Court, S.D. Florida · 2023
  5. Bertelsen v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API