Legal Opinion

Herbert Whitlock v. Salvador Godinez

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 9, 1995No. 93-3731PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORAN, District Judge.

Petitioner Herbert Whitlock (Whitlock) appeals the denial of his petition for habeas corpus brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The district court dismissed Whitlock’s petition as a successive writ, concluding that the same issues were raised in an earlier habeas petition. Whitlock argues that the successive writ doctrine does not apply if there has never been an evidentiary hearing to resolve disputed facts, and that even if it is applicable his petition should nevertheless be heard since he has made a colorable showing of factual innocence. We affirm.

I

A. Whitlock’s State…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Kuhlmann v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Leantry Benton v. Odie WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  2. Herbert H. Dellenbach v. Craig A. HanksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  3. Dewayne C. Britz v. Roger D. Cowan, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  4. Flowers v. HanksDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1996
  5. United States Ex Rel. Balderas v. GodinezDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API