Legal Opinion

Dollar Bank v. Swartz

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 11, 1995PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FLAHERTY, Justice.

In this mortgage foreclosure action brought by a bank against guarantors of a commercial loan to a new corporation, we are faced with interrelated issues involving the perfection of security interests under the Uniform Commercial Code, involuntary bankruptcy of the primary debtor, the impairment of obligations, and the interpretation of contract language requiring “reasonable” efforts by the bank to collect the debt from the corporation prior to foreclosing on the mortgage. We affirm the grant of summary judgment for the mortgagors, precluding foreclosure…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Tagnani v. LewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. International Milling Co. v. Hachmeister, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Kimmel v. Somerset County CommissionersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Com., Dept. of Transp. v. BorosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Harber Philadelphia Center City Office Ltd. v. LPCI Ltd. PartnershipSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Cleveland v. Johns-Manville Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Stange, T. v. Janssen PharmaceuticalsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Roman Mosaic & Tile Co. v. Thomas P. Carney, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Conner v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API