Legal Opinion
McGoldrick v. Family Finance Corp.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 5, 1942PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lehman, Ch. J.
The defendant corporation is engaged in “ the business of making loans of money, credit, goods, or things in action in the amount or of the value of three hundred dollars or less * * It has obtained a license from the Superintendent of Banks in accordance with the provisions of article IX of the Banking Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 2), and it may charge, contract for and receive interest “ not exceeding three per centum per month on any part of the unpaid principal balance of the loan not in excess of one hundred and fifty dollars and two and one-half per centum per month on any…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- National Citizens' Bank v. . ToplitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- National Citizens' Bank v. ToplitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Westville & Hamden Loan Co. v. PasqualSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
3Cited by11 opinions
- SIN, Inc. v. Department of FinanceNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- De Persia v. Merchants Mutual Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
- Servido v. Superintendent of InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Del Giorno v. Police DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- Franklin National Bank v. Eurez Construction Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.