Legal Opinion

Franklin National Bank v. Eurez Construction Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1969PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBernard S. Meyer, J.

In this action, tried without a jury, plaintiff bank seeks in its first cause of action to require defendant Eurez Construction Corporation to indorse a promissory note of J. J. White Ready Mix Concrete Corp. payable to Eurez and negotiated to the bank by an officer of Eurez; in the second cause of action seeks to recover from Eurez the $20,000 which it received from the bank as a result of such negotiation; in the third cause of action seeks to recover from Eurez, J. J. White Ready Mix Concrete Corp. and John J. White, as indorser, on the note, it having been dishonored when due; and in the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Grocers' Bank v. Buffalo & PenfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Chester v. . DorrNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  3. McGoldrick v. Family Finance Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1942
  4. Packard v. WindholzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  5. Davis v. SistiNew York Supreme Court · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v. GreenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Goldblatt Bros., Inc. v. Addison Green Meadows, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  3. Hyman v. GolioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. Goldblatt Bros., Inc. v. Addison Green Meadows, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  5. Sullivan County National Bank v. LiemanNew York Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API