Canal Insurance v. Tackett
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HULL, J.
Defendant Billie Tackett appeals from an order awarding plaintiff Canal Insurance Company attorney fees from interest that had accrued on interpleader funds deposited with the court. Defendant contends that (1) plaintiff did not give the requisite notice for its fee motion and (2) an award of fees from interest on interpleader funds is statutorily prohibited. This latter point is dispositive, and we reverse the trial court’s order.
Facts And Procedural History
Defendant was one of several people injured in a vehicle accident caused by the driver of a tractor-trailer rig. A number…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Day v. City of FontanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- GTE Directories Corp. v. Ad-Vantage Telephone DirectoryDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1995
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sahadi v. ScheafferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Patterson Flying Service v. Department of Pesticide RegulationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Southern California Gas Co. v. FlanneryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Sacramento County Employees' Retirement System v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Friends of Aviara v. City of Carlsbad CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.