Legal Opinion

Canal Insurance v. Tackett

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 30, 2004No. C044357PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HULL, J.

Defendant Billie Tackett appeals from an order awarding plaintiff Canal Insurance Company attorney fees from interest that had accrued on interpleader funds deposited with the court. Defendant contends that (1) plaintiff did not give the requisite notice for its fee motion and (2) an award of fees from interest on interpleader funds is statutorily prohibited. This latter point is dispositive, and we reverse the trial court’s order.

Facts And Procedural History

Defendant was one of several people injured in a vehicle accident caused by the driver of a tractor-trailer rig. A number…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Day v. City of FontanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. GTE Directories Corp. v. Ad-Vantage Telephone DirectoryDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1995

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sahadi v. ScheafferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. Patterson Flying Service v. Department of Pesticide RegulationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Southern California Gas Co. v. FlanneryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. Sacramento County Employees' Retirement System v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Friends of Aviara v. City of Carlsbad CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API