Legal Opinion

John A. Robbling's Sons Co. v. Gray

California Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1903No. S.F. No. 2739PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, and the point relied on for a reversal is to be determined from an examination of the judgment-roll, solely, as it is unaccompanied by any bill of exceptions or statement on motion for a new trial. The complaint alleged three separate causes of action, the first for a balance of $808.50 for wire lathing; the second on an assigned claim from one S. Y. Mooney for labor performed, amounting to $341.20, “in fitting and putting up wire lathing in the Claus Spreckels Building”; and, third, for labor furnished by plaintiff in the same…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Winslow v. GohransenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Dolliver v. DolliverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Millar v. MillarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Brown v. Sterling Furniture Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Reed & Co. v. HarshallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  4. Fairbanks v. MacReadyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API