Legal Opinion

City of Sunnyside v. Gonzalez

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 2017No. 93907-1Published

1Opinion of the Court

This opinion was filed for record at t);oo& oJWJ. )8 221/1 c5.U,0wc- c{ SUSAN L. CARLSON ~I SUPREME COURT CLERK IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON ) CITY OF SUNNYSIDE, ) ) Respondent, ) No. 93907-1 ) V. ) ) ENBANC ANDREAS GONZALEZ, ) ) Petitioner. ) Filed: JUN 2 ~J 2017 __________) YU, J.-- This case presents a highly fact-intensive question: Is there substantial evidence that petitioner Andreas Gonzalez's car and money were connected to drug manufacturing or distribution such that they are subject to forfeiture? The Sunnyside Municipal Court, acting as a hearing examiner, said…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. King County v. Central Puget SoundWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. King County v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. ColeWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. United States v. U.S. Currency, $30,060.00, Albert Joseph Alexander, Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  5. Callecod v. Washington State PatrolCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API