Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Hunnicutt

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 27, 1973No. 48264PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Judge.

The requests just set out to do no more than call on the plaintiff to admit his lawsuit was filed in bad faith, and should of course be stricken on objection. Hobbs v. New England Ins. Co., 212 Ga. 513 (3) (93 SE2d 653). Nor would answers to the remaining questions give the defendants any material facts which would help them in the defense beyond that already obtained. The question is simply whether, under these circumstances, the trial court had any discretion to extend the time for answer or objection. Obviously, if all the requests are to be taken as admitted the defendants are…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hobbs v. New England InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  2. Moore v. HansonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
  3. Bailey v. BaileySupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
  4. Walker Enterprises, Inc. v. MullisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  5. Baranan v. KazakosCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. G. H. Bass & Co. v. Fulton County Board of Tax AssessorsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  2. Spires v. Relco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  3. Peppers v. SieffermanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  4. Coolik v. HawkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  5. 131 Ralph McGill Boulevard, LLC v. First Intercontinental BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API