Legal Opinion
Coolik v. Hawk
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided December 3, 1974No. 49911PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Presiding Judge.
1. Coolik appeals from the denial of his motion for summary judgment, based on failure of the defendant Hawk to reply to requests for admission which went to the general issue of Hawk’s liability. The appellant’s position may be stated as follows:(a) Code Ann. § 81A-136 (a) requires that the matter of which request is made "is admitted unless, within 30 days after service of the request... the party... serves... a written answer or objection addressed to the matter.”(b) The requests for admission were not answered and the matter is admitted and demands judgment in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- New Zealand Fire Insurance v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. MoselySupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Harper v. PlunkettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Bailey v. BaileySupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
- Taylor v. HunnicuttCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Moore Ventures Limited Partnership v. StackCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Fountain v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- 131 Ralph McGill Boulevard, LLC v. First Intercontinental BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- Chambers v. AlmondCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Hospital Authority of Houston County v. Pyrotechnic Specialties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.