Legal Opinion

Peppers v. Siefferman

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 8, 1980No. 58833PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carley, Judge.

Appellee, plaintiff below, brought suit against appellant in two counts, seeking recovery on a promissory note and on an open account. Appellee moved for and was granted summary judgment on both counts. Appellant appeals.

1. Appellant enumerates the denial of her motion for continuance because of the absence of her lead counsel. The transcript, however, reflects that appellant was represented by counsel at the hearing and no motion for a continuance was made at that time based upon the absence of "lead” counsel. This enumeration is without merit. Parker v. Belcher, 87 Ga. 110 (13…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brucker v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Moore v. TrounstineSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. Waters v. LanierCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  4. Middlebrooks v. CabanissSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  5. Stratton & McLendon, Inc. v. CAMERON-BROWN COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Olympic Development Group, Inc. v. American Druggists' InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  2. Clay v. OxendineCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  3. Allied Gas & Chemical Co. v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  4. Abalene Pest Control Service, Inc. v. Orkin Exterminating Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  5. McFARLAND v. HODGE HOMEBUILDERS, INCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API