Legal Opinion

Norman Drews v. State of Minnesota

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 10, 1969No. 19315_1PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAY, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner appeals from an order of the district court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The Supreme Court of Minnesota had earlier affirmed his conviction of burglary in the state district court. State v. Drews, 274 Minn. 426, 144 N.W.2d 251 (1966).

Petitioner here alleges the federal district court erred in denying his petition because (1) he was deprived of due process by reason of the state’s proof of other burglaries, without demonstrating a causal connection with the crime charged; and (2) he was denied a fair trial due to the state’s failure to endorse…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Richard E. Loux and Neil Conrad Wallen v. United States of America, Vertis James Barrett, Arthur St. Peter Andharold Oscar Thomas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  4. Mack Dean v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
  5. William Edward Love v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. James G. BarnesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
  2. United States v. ColeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
  3. United States v. Roy Harding Gallington and Wilbur Eugene StreeterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
  4. United States v. Willie J. VaughnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
  5. Hence v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API