Legal Opinion
William Edward Love v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 11, 1968No. 18676_1PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VOGEL, Chief Judge.
Following grand jury indictment, William Edward Love, appellant herein, was tried before and found guilty by a jury of a violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 2312, commonly referred to as the Dyer Act. Appeal is taken from the judgment of conviction.
The facts upon which Hayappeal is based are for the most part uncontrovert-ed. On Sunday, May 22, 1966, appellant Love negotiated in Aberdeen, South Dakota, with Merle Cruz-for the purchase from Bieber of a 1963 Chevrolet Impala automobile which Bieber had advertised as being for sale. After some negotiating a price of $1,650 was agreed…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- United States v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Baird v. KoernerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States v. John David WoodallCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Millie B. Heathman v. United States District Court for the Central District of California,respondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. William C. Brickey, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Thomas ClemonsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Cyrus LewisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.