Legal Opinion

Kinzie v. Winston

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1870PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon Erastus S. Williams, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breese

This was an action of ejectment, brought to the September term, 1869, of the Cook circuit court, by Robert A. Kinzie against Frederick H. Winston, to recover the possession of lots one, two, three, sixteen, seventeen and eighteen in Kinzie’s addition to Chicago. The cause was tried by the court without the intervention of a jury, resulting in a judgment for the defendant.

To reverse this judgment the plaintiff appeals, assigning the usual errors.

The ground of the plaintiff’s claim to recover, as is shown by the record, was this: Kinzie, being the owner, by purchase from the United States, of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Comegys v. VasseSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. Marcy v. TaylorIllinois Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Holbrook v. ConeyIllinois Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Krumbaar v. BurtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania · 1809

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Freeland v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  2. Marshall Et Ux. v. HartmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  3. Lombard v. KinzieIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Gale v. KinzieIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Caples v. TaliaferroSupreme Court of Florida · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API