Legal Opinion

Gale v. Kinzie

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1875PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. S. M. Moore, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breese

We have examined this record with great care, and can find no fact established by the proofs in it, of a nature sufficient to change the views this court entertained and expressed in Kinzie v. Winston, 56 Ill. 56. It was there held, on the strength of the testimony then before us, and which is embodied in this record, that, at the date of Kinzie’s bankruptcy, in 1841, there was a portion of this triangle forming a part of Sand street, vested in Kinzie, and passed to his assignee in bankruptcy, and was a proper subject of sale by the assignee. This was the title under which Winston claimed and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kinzie v. WinstonIllinois Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. WardIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Stockley v. CissnaTennessee Supreme Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API