Legal Opinion

Polar Ice & Fuel Co. v. Mulray

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 2, 1918No. 10,176PublishedCited by 29 opinions

From the Industrial Board of Indiana. Proceedings for compensation under the .Workmen’s Compensation Act by Bessie Mulray against the Polar Ice and Fuel Company and another. From an award for applicant, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtIbach, C. J.

While appellee’s husband was at work at the plant of appellant ahother employe shot and killed him. Appellee filed her claim for compensation before the Industrial Board under the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Acts 1915 p. 392) and com-: pensation was allowed.

The only claim made by appellant is that the evidence does not sustain the finding of. the Industrial Board that the accident arose out of decedent’s employment. The uncontroverted facts are substantially the following: John Mulray, decedent, was employed by appellant to keep a record of ice taken from its ice plant to be sold by its…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United Paperboard Co. v. LewisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. In re LoperIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Union Sanitary Manufacturing Co. v. DavisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  2. Western Pac. R. R. Co. v. Indus. Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Swing v. Kokomo Steel & Wire Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. McClure v. Georgia Casualty Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  5. Willis v. Pilot Butte Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1920

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API