Joseph Spaulding v. Joseph Cook (mem. dec.)

Najam, Judge.

Statement of the Case

[1] Following an automobile accident, Joseph Spaulding sued Joseph Cook, and, prior to trial, Cook stipulated that he was 100% at fault for causing the accident. At the conclusion of a trial on damages, the jury awarded Spaulding no damages. Spaulding filed a motion to correct error in which he alleged, in essence, that the verdict was inconsistent with the evidence and inadequate as a matter of law. The trial court denied that motion. Spaulding appeals and claims that the trial court abused its discretion when it denied his motion to correct error. We affirm.