Legal Opinion
Clark ex rel. Clark v. Arizona Interscholastic Ass'n
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 2, 1982No. 82-5132PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NELSON, Circuit Judge:
Appellants seek review of the district court’s judgment dismissing their claim that Appellees* policy of precluding boys from playing on girls’ interscholastic volleyball teams in Arizona high schools violates the equal protection clause. The district court held that the policy was a permissible means of attempting to insure equality of opportunity for girls in Arizona interscholastic sports and of redressing past discrimination. We affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The Appellants, plaintiffs below, are students in Arizona High Schools, and have demonstrated their…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Frontiero v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Graham v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Mississippi University for Women v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Israel Ex Rel. Israel v. West Virginia Secondary Schools Activities CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
- Sarah Anne Williams Wayne Williams, on Behalf of Their Minor Son, John Williams v. The School District of Bethlehem, PaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Brewer v. PurvisDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1993
- Dennin Ex Rel. Dennin v. Connecticut Interscholastic Athletic Conference, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1996
- Haffer v. Temple University of the Commonwealth System of Higher EducationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.