Legal Opinion
Brewer v. Purvis
District Court, M.D. Georgia
Decided March 10, 1993No. Civ. 91-39-ATH(DF)PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FITZPATRICK, District Judge.
Defendants’ motions for summary judgment are presently pending in this Court. Summary judgment is proper “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). For purposes of a summary judgment motion, the non-movant’s version of the facts must be accepted, and all disputed matters must be resolved in favor of the non-movant. Bishop v. Wood, 426 U.S.…
2Cases cited86 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Frances J. v. Robert WrightCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Archuleta v. LacuestaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Howard v. Steris Corp.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2012
- Hughes v. Alabama Department of Public SafetyDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1998
- Sickon v. School Bd. of Alachua CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.