Legal Opinion

Seevers v. Potter

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1995No. S-94-077PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.

David W. Seevers brought this criminal defense legal malpractice action seeking damages in the amount of $12,362.73 for the alleged professional negligence of the defendant, Paul Stephen Potter, stemming from Potter’s representation of Seevers in various criminal matters. Upon a demurrer filed by Potter, the district court dismissed Seevers’ amended petition on the ground that it was barred by the statute of limitations, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-222 (Reissue 1989). Seevers asks this court to determine that the statute of limitations for pursuing a legal malpractice claim against a criminal…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Gebhardt v. O'ROURKEMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Carmel v. LunneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Shaw v. State, Department of Administration, Public Defender AgencyAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Rosnick v. MarksNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Anderson v. Nashua Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Coscia v. McKenna & CuneoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Trobaugh v. SondagSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
  3. Berringer v. SteeleCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  4. Rodriguez v. NielsenNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Morrison v. GoffSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API