Legal Opinion
Stinnett v. Paramount-Famous Lasky Corp. of New York
Texas Commission of Appeals
Decided April 1, 1931No. 1367—5519PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.
For a partial statement of the nature .and result of this ease, we adopt the admirable statement made by Chief Justice Gallagher in the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals, 17 S.W.(2d) 125, which is as follows:
“This suit was instituted by appellees, R. J. Stinnett and S. Charninsky, against appellants, Paramount Famous Dasky Corporation and six subsidiary corporations, to recover $150,000 actual and $300,000 exemplary damages for the alleged ‘wanton, malicious, deliberate and unlawful destruction of plaintiffs’ 'business, in violation of the laws against trusts and conspiracies in restraint…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Gussie Fox v. Dallas Hotel Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1922
- Porter v. SabinSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Wallace v. Lincoln Savings BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
- General Rubber Co. v. . BenedictNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Green v. Victor Talking MacH. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- Wingate v. HajdikTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- Dallas Railway & Terminal Co. v. BaileyTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- Empire Life Insurance Company of America v. Valdak CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Sutter v. General Petroleum Corp.California Supreme Court · 1946
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.