Legal Opinion

Brown v. Electric Railway Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1898PublishedCited by 20 opinions

FROM HAMILTON. Appeal from Circuit Court of Hamilton County. Floyd Estill, J.

1Opinion of the CourtWilkes, J.

This is an. action for personal injuries, resulting in the death of plaintiff’s husband, Andrew Brown. Defendant introduced no evidence, but demurred to that of plaintiff, which was sustained by the trial Judge and the suit dismissed, and the plaintiff has appealed and assigned errors.

The defendant, as one of his pleas, stated that the matter of damages arising out of this accident was compromised and settled with the deceased in his lifetime.

There was a replication to this plea, among other things, to the effect that this settlement was before the husband died, and before the plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Loughlin v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Kranz v. Long Island Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Hughes v. Malden & Melrose Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  4. Pederson v. City of RushfordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. D. M. Rose & Co. v. SnyderTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Mooney v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Thomas v. Georgia Granite Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  4. Ferguson v. Phoenix Cotton HillsTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Walker v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API