Legal Opinion
State v. Layman
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided December 14, 1960No. A-12977PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POWELL, Presiding Judge.
A. H. “Herb” Layman, Thomas Clinton Layman, and Andrew H. Layman, Jr., on March 15, 1960 were indicted by a grand jury in Tulsa County, and charged with having “obtained money by means of false pretenses in violation of Title 21 O.S.Supp. 1953, Section 1541.” Pertinent portions of such citation read:
“Every person who, with intent to cheat and defraud, shall obtain or attempt to obtain from any person, firm or corporation, any money, property or valuable thing, * * * by means or by use of * * * false or fraudulent representation or statement or pretense, * * *. If the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Ex Parte MeadowsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
- Ex Parte BarnettCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939
- United States v. ThayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Commonwealth v. MezickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Layman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1960
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. LoveCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998
- Morrison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1990
- Maytubby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1983
- Bartlett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1987
- Broadway v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1991