Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Layman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided August 29, 1960No. A12912PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRETT, Judge.

This is an original action by petition for writ of mandamus, in aid of appellate jurisdiction, brought by A. H. (Herb) Layman, Thomas Clinton Layman, and Andrew H. Layman, Jr., against Robert D. Simms, County Attorney of Tulsa County, Oklahoma, and Honorable Leslie Webb, judge of said District Court of said County. The petitioners are charged in the District Court by indictments numbers 18452, 18453, 18455, 18456, 18457, and 18458, for the despicable crimes of obtaining money from the State of Oklahoma by false pretenses, by means of certain alleged false and fraudulent,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Jencks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Palermo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. People v. RiserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Powell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. People v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. McCarty v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1988
  2. Shapard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1967
  3. Amoco Production Co. v. LindleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  4. Pierce v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1990
  5. Ray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API