Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Mezick

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 8, 1941No. Appeal, 41PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, P. J.,

Three true bills were returned in Susquehanna County to January Sessions, 1941, charging that the appellant, Daniel Mezick, and John Buchla, John Mezick and John Oshmankewicz had jointly conspired to cheat and defraud the Carolina, Fire Insurance Company (No. 6), the Homestead Insurance Company (No. 7) and the Home Underwriters Fire Insurance Company (No. 8). The bills were drawn under section 302 of the Criminal Code of June 24, 1939, P. L. 872.

By consent of all parties, the three bills were consolidated and tried as one, resulting in a verdict of guilty as to all…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Commonwealth v. StrantzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  4. Commonwealth v. GiacobbeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Commonwealth v. BartilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WableSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Commonwealth v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Commonwealth v. PrepSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Commonwealth v. CreamerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Commonwealth v. KauffmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API