Commonwealth v. Romero
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CERCONE, Judge:
This is an interlocutory appeal as of right taken by the Commonwealth from the trial court’s order granting suppression of physical evidence. See Pa.R.A.P., Rule 311(d), 42 Pa.C.S.A. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
The events underlying this appeal began on September 25, 1993 at approximately 3:30 in the morning. 1 Philadelphia Housing Police Officer Jake Bolden was patrolling on foot in a deserted area near the Richard Allen Housing Project on North Sartain Street in Philadelphia. As the officer approached the project, he noticed appellee, Don Romero, holding a…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GraySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. LovetteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. ZookSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth v. QuilesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ThompsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Commonwealth v. FreemanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Commonwealth v. DommelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. TaggartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.