Commonwealth v. Rodriguez
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
LARSEN, Justice.*
The matter presented to this Court is whether there was sufficient probable cause to search the automobile owned by appellant, Gloria Rodriguez, and if so, were the circumstances such that a search warrant was not needed.1
On November 15, 1985, police received information from two reliable informants that appellant and her husband would be coming into York, Pennsylvania, to sell cocaine. The police had been told that appellant and her husband could be driving any one of several vehicles, including a black Trans Am, a white Chevy, and two or three…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Commonwealth v. GraySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. SullivanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. WebsterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. WagnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by120 opinions
- Renk v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. GarySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. EllisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.