Legal Opinion

Allgood v. Meridian Security Insurance Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 2005No. 49S02-0501-CV-3PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOEHM, Justice.

We hold that an insurance policy that provides coverage for loss limited to the lesser of the actual cash value or the amount necessary to repair or replace the property with other property of like kind and quality does not obligate the insurer to compensate for diminution in value of the property after adequate repairs have been made.

Factual and Procedural Background

Cynthia Allgood's automobile was damaged while insured by Meridian Security Insurance Company. The record does not reveal the cause of the damage, but Meridian paid the cost of repairs to Allgood's vehicle under…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. SchaeferTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. American States Insurance Co. v. KigerIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Randy v. Progressive Northern Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  4. Eli Lilly & Co. v. Home Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Siegle v. Progressive Consumers Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2002

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Dunn v. Meridian Mutual Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Prime Mortgage USA, Inc. v. NicholsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Bradshaw v. ChandlerIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Erie Indemnity Company, as Attorney-in-Fact for the Subscribers at Erie Insurance Exchange v. Estate of Brian L. Harris, by Its Special Representative, Laura Harris, and Anna Marie HarrisIndiana Supreme Court · 2018
  5. American Family Mutual Insuran v. David WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API