Legal Opinion

Ship Construction & Trading Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 1, 1940No. H-376PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLittletoN, Judge

Plaintiff claims that on August 9, 1921, the United States through the Shipping Board unconditionally accepted its *455bid for 268 wooden ships with machinery, equipment, spare-parts, and supplies, as amended by its bid of August 5, 1921, and that such bid and such alleged actions constituted a legal and binding contract between the parties which it is alleged the defendant breached between August 9 and September 27, 1921, by refusing to deliver the ships in accordance with the terms.and conditions of the bid as amended. Whether there was a legal and binding contract between the parties…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Billings v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Monroe v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. Enright v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931
  4. Cathell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1911
  5. Jacob Reed's Sons, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Sol O. Schlesinger, Doing Business as Ideal Uniform Cap Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  2. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
  3. Peninsula Group Capital Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  4. American General Leasing, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
  5. Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API