Legal Opinion

Jacob Reed's Sons, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 5, 1925No. B-42PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHat, Judge

The plaintiff relies upon the provision of the Dent Act (40 Stat. 1272). Section 1 of that act provides as follows:

“That the Secretary of War be, and he is hereby, authorized to adjust, pay, or discharge any agreement, express or implied, upon a fair and equitable basis that has been entered into, in good faith during the present emergency and prior to November 12, 1918, by any officer or agent acting under his authority, direction, or instruction, or that of the President, with any person, firm, or corporation for the *103acquisition of lands, or the use thereof, or for damages resulting from…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. GAY STREET CORPORATION OF BALTIMORE v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
  2. Ship Construction & Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940
  3. Byrne Organization, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
  4. Brunner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  5. Teetor-Hartley Motor Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API