Legal Opinion
City of Perry v. Procter & Gamble Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 19, 2016No. 15-CV-8051 (JMF)PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge:
Plaintiff, the city of Perry, Iowa (“Perry” or the “City”), brings this putative class action against six leading manufacturers of so-called “flushable wipes”: Procter <& Gamble Company (“P&G”), Kimberly-Clark Corporation (“Kimberly-Clark”), Nice-Pak Products, Inc. (“Nice-Pak”), Professional Disposables International, Inc. (“PDI”), Tufco Technologies Inc. (“Tufco”), and Rockline Industries (“Rockline”). Perry alleges that, contrary to Defendants’ representations, the wipes are not actually “flushable” because they do not degrade…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Kurtz v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- EFG Bank AG v. AXA Equitable Life Ins. Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Dennis v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Kurtz v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- AJ Energy LLC v. Woori America BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.