Legal Opinion
Ashmus v. Calderon
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 24, 1998No. C 93-0594 TEHPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: APPLICABILITY OF CHAPTER 151
THELTON E. HENDERSON, District Judge.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Introduction
This matter comes before the Court on respondent’s request that the parties submit supplemental briefs addressing the applicability of Chapter 154 of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”) 1 to these proceedings. Chapter 154 provides expedited habeas review procedures and other substantive benefits to states that qualify to “opt in.” In order to qualify, states must establish a system to assure that capital defendants receive competent legal representation for…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- In Re ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Lonchar v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Demarest v. ManspeakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wrench Llc, a Michigan Limited Liability Company Joseph Shields Thomas Rinks v. Taco Bell Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Steven K. Dunlap v. G &L Holding GroupCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Troy A. Ashmus v. Jeanne Woodford, Acting Warden of California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Dennis v. WoodfordDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1999
- Anthony Marshall Spears v. Terry Stewart, Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections, OpinionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.