Legal Opinion

Anthony Marshall Spears v. Terry Stewart, Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections, Opinion

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 20, 2002No. 01-99000PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRABER, Circuit Judge:

In this interlocutory appeal, we have agreed to answer the following question: “whether Arizona, as of July [17], 1998,[ 1 ] qualified to opt-in to Chapter 154, Special Habeas Corpus Procedures in Capital Cases, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2261-2266,” a part of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA). We hold that Arizona’s mechanism for the appointment of counsel for indigent capital defendants in state post-conviction proceedings met the requirements of Chapter 154 and, accordingly, qualified for opt-in status as of that date. However, we also hold that…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Saenz v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Calderon v. AshmusSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Mata v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  4. State Bar of Arizona v. Arizona Land Title & Trust Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Tucker v. CatoeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Spears v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Spears v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. Spears v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API