Anthony Marshall Spears v. Terry Stewart, Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections, Opinion
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GRABER, Circuit Judge:
In this interlocutory appeal, we have agreed to answer the following question: “whether Arizona, as of July [17], 1998,[ 1 ] qualified to opt-in to Chapter 154, Special Habeas Corpus Procedures in Capital Cases, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2261-2266,” a part of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA). We hold that Arizona’s mechanism for the appointment of counsel for indigent capital defendants in state post-conviction proceedings met the requirements of Chapter 154 and, accordingly, qualified for opt-in status as of that date. However, we also hold that…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Saenz v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Calderon v. AshmusSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Mata v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- State Bar of Arizona v. Arizona Land Title & Trust Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1961
- Tucker v. CatoeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Spears v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Spears v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Spears v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002