Legal Opinion
Adair v. Ferst
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided June 26, 1942No. 2451PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUSSELL, District Judge.
The motion to dismiss urged by M. A. Ferst, Ltd., and the individual defendants, seeks dismissal of the suit upon the ground that, as to them, the suit is not one arising under any law of the United States regulating commerce.
In considering the merits of the motion to dismiss, the averments of the petition, now to be considered as true, establish inter alia, that Trailcar, Inc., is liable to the plaintiff in the sum of $619.24, because of violating of the minimum wage and overtime compensation provisions of the Fair Labor Standards,Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq.; that,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Robertson v. Argus Hosiery Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cuervo v. Airport Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2013
- Atlantic Coast Line R. v. New York Casualty Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1944
- Shunzhe v. Daewoosa Samoa, Ltd.High Court of American Samoa · 2002