Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Rice
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR to the district court op the united STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT. OF LOUISIANA. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds
Did the District Court rightly decide that it had no jurisdiction, is the' only question presented.
Plaintiff in error sued to recover one hundred and forty-five dollars claimed to be due under/ tariffs approved and. published as required by Interstate Commerce'Act, for disinfecting fifty-eight cars containing live stock shipped -from points outside the State and delivered to defendant, the consignee, at New Orleans, Louisiana. It alleged presentation of bills covering each shipment and payment by-defendant of all charges except those for disinfecting — two dollars and fifty cents per car.
Answe…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- The Fair v. Kohler Die & Specialty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Shulthis v. McDougalSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Tennessee v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by94 opinions
- MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. Teleconcepts, Incorporated, Defendant/third-Party v. Bell of Pennsylvania, Third-Party Teleconcepts, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Switchmen's Union v. National Mediation BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Southern New England Telephone Co. v. Global NAPs Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Binderup v. Pathe Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Elam v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.