Legal Opinion

State v. Allen

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 2005No. 20000531PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURRANT, Justice:

¶ 1 Defendant Paul Christopher Allen appeals his conviction for aggravated murder. He argues that numerous prejudicial errors occurred during the course of his trial and requests that this court reverse his conviction. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

¶2 “On appeal from a jury verdict, we view the evidence and all reasonable inferences in a light most favorable to that verdict and recite the facts accordingly.” State v. Gordon, 913 P.2d 350, 351 (Utah 1996).

¶ 3 On the evening of August 28, 1996, police were called to Allen’s North Salt Lake City apartment, where they discovered Allen and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. Alexander, JoeyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
  2. State v. ShicklesUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  3. United States v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  4. State v. DecorsoUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Smith v. Four Corners Mental Health Center, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2003

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Allen v. FrielUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Daines v. VincentUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. ReeceUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State v. LenkartUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State v. CuttlerUtah Supreme Court · 2015

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API