State v. Cuttler
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Justice HIMONAS,
opinion of the Court:
INTRODUCTION
11 The State charged the defendant, James Cuttler, with vaginally raping .and orally and anally sodomizing his then seven-year-old daughter,. To bolster its case, the State sought to introduce evidence pursuant to rule 404(c) of the Utah Rules of Evidence that in 1984 and 1985 Cuttler vaginally raped and orally and anally sodomized his then eight- and ten-year-old daughters, demonstrating "a propensity to commit the crimes] charged." Urax R. Evip. 404(c)(1). Cuttler objected. He argued that such evidence was inadmissible under rule "404(c)…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jau-Fei Chen v. StewartUtah Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. ShicklesUtah Supreme Court · 1988
- J.S. v. R.T.H.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- State v. LuceroUtah Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. AllenUtah Supreme Court · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- State v. ThorntonUtah Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. MetUtah Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. LowtherUtah Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. RingUtah Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. HatfieldUtah Supreme Court · 2020
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.