Legal Opinion
Goldfuss v. Davidson
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided June 25, 1997No. 1995-2014PublishedCited by 75 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 79 Ohio St.3d 116.] GOLDFUSS, ADMR., APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE, v. DAVIDSON, APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT. [Cite as Goldfuss v. Davidson,
1997-Ohio-401.] Civil procedure—Plain error doctrine is not favored, but may be applied, when. In appeals of civil cases, the plain error doctrine is not favored and may be applied only in the extremely rare case involving exceptional circumstances where error, to which no objection was made at the trial court, seriously affects the basic fairness, integrity, or public reputation of the judicial…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Henry Lavado, Jr. v. Patrick W. KeohaneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. AwanOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Goldfuss v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court · 1997
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- Dunn v. RansomOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. DelawderOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Mtge. Electronic Registration Sys. v. Petry, 2008-P-0016 (10-10-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Choate v. Tranet, Inc., Unpublished Decision (9-5-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. Hawthorne, Unpublished Decision (12-16-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.