Legal Opinion

Manemann v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 21, 1994No. 3-93-245-CRPublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DALLY, Justice (Retired).

Appellant was convicted of the offense of telephone harassment on his plea of not guilty entered before the court. In his appeal, appellant asserts the evidence is insufficient to sustain the conviction because he was not identified as the caller making the threat, and because the caller did not threaten to inflict serious bodily injury on the recipient of the call. We will affirm the judgment.

Act of May 26, 1983, 68th Leg., R.S., eh. 411, § 1, 1983 Tex.Gen. Laws 2204, 2205 (Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 42.07(a)(2) (since amended)).

As it read at the time of this offense,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Griffin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Studer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  4. United States v. Alfredo Orozco-SantillanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. Gray v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Brock v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  2. Meyer v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2012
  3. Stevenson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
  4. Blount v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
  5. Brock v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API