Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Burnup & Sims, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 12, 1957PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERRELL, Chief Justice.

Coleman, the claimant, was injured while in the employment of respondent, Burnup and Sims, Inc. His injury occurred two and one-half weeks after he was employed, making recovery depend on Section 440.14 (2), Florida Statutes, F.S.A. as follows:

“If the injured employee shall not have worked in such employment during substantially the whole of thirteen weeks immediately preceding the injury, the wages of a similar employee in the same employment who has worked substantially the whole of such thirteen weeks shall be used in making the determination under the preceding…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. US Casualty Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1951
  2. Hardy v. City of Tarpon SpringsSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  3. Andrews v. Strecker Body BuildersSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  4. Fischer v. John W. Thomson & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1957
  5. Wilkes v. PittmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1957

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Carvell v. Caviness Motor Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  2. Expicare Nursing Services v. EudaleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  3. Cody v. United Parcel ServiceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  4. Hilton v. Coral Springs HondaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API