Fischer v. John W. Thomson & Son, Inc.
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
THORNAL, Justice.
By petition for certiorari petitioner Fischer, an employee-claimant, seeks review of a workmen’s compensation order.
The only point necessary to consider is whether the deputy commissioner included in his order sufficient “findings of fact” to comply with the requirements of the Workmen’s Compensation Law.
The order involved recited that the claimant had suffered a permanent-partial disability to the extent of twenty per cent of *527the body as a whole. The order then included the following:
“That, after considering the claimant’s education, experience, age, present physical…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- US Casualty Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1951
- Ball v. MannSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Hardy v. City of Tarpon SpringsSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
3Cited by6 opinions
- Batte v. Stanley'sNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- STATE EX REL. IOWA NAT. MUT. INS. CO. v. Florida Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Florida · 1963
- Coleman v. Burnup & Sims, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1957
- Brock v. Sey Construction Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1970
- Charlton v. Dan Brosnahan Construction Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.