Legal Opinion

Watson v. Hollis

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 1950No. 4 Div. 164PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CARR, Judge.

This suit was brought 'by the plaintiff below for damages which in his complaint he claims he suffered because of negligence of the defendant. The verdict of the jury was favorable to the plaintiff.

The court granted the defendant’s motion for a new trial, and this appeal is based on this action of the trial judge.

The order granting the motion does not disclose nor indicate the ground on which the judgment was predicated. In this state of the record we must sustain the judgment if we conclude that it is authorized on any ground assigned in the motion. W. M. Templeton & Son v.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Parker v. Hayes Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  3. W. M. Templeton & Son v. DavidSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  4. Martin v. Birmingham Southern R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  5. Crumpton v. Pilgrim Health & Life Ins. Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Abbott v. Alabama Coca Cola Bottling Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API