Abbott v. Alabama Coca Cola Bottling Co.

CARR, Presiding Judge.

In the court below the plaintiff’s cause of action was for damages to personal property arising out of a collision between his .automobile and defendant’s truck.

The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff.

On motion of the defendant the presiding judge granted a new trial. This appeal is based on this judgment.

In the motion for a new trial there are several grounds stated. Among them is that the verdict of the jury was contrary to the great weight of the evidence.

The judge did not specify in his order the ground of the motion on which his .action was based.

In…