State v. Eisele
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Scott county, Macdonald, J., presiding, refusing a new trial, the defendant having been convicted of obstructing a public highway. „
1Opinion of the Court
Gilfillan, C. J.1
Indictment for a nuisance in obstructing a public street. The state, on the trial, claimed that the land over which the alleged street ran was dedicated by the owner, one Holmes, to-public use as a street, and that the dedication was accepted by user-on the part of the public. Defendant purchased the land* from the heirs of Holmes, and claimed that it never was dedicated as a street; and that was really the only issue at the trial, for on,the evidence there was no dispute that for several years the public used it as a street, nor is there any that defendant blocked it up by…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Marvin v. DutcherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
3Cited by11 opinions
- Riley v. BuchananCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
- Anderson v. BirkelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- City of Indianapolis v. HigginsIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- State v. MeyerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Armstrong v. Johnson Storage & Moving Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1928
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.