Legal Opinion
City of Indianapolis v. Higgins
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided April 9, 1895No. 17,379PublishedCited by 17 opinions
From the Marion Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.
This action was commenced by the city of Indianapolis to recover from appellee a penalty for a violation of an ordinance of said city. There was judgment against appellant in the circuit court.
It was charged in the complaint that the defendant had violated sections 59 and 66 of the ordinance by unlawfully driving a horse and vehicle thereto attached across and along an improved sidewalk of said city. Said section 59 of the ordinance is as follows:
“Section 59. It shall be unlawful to drive, lead or back any draft animal, or any vehicle thereto attached, across or along any improved sidewalk of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. BerdettaIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Sims v. City of FrankfortIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Cox v. Louisville, New Albany, & Chicago RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- State ex rel. Holt v. DennyIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Debolt v. CarterIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Sarlls, City Clerk v. State, Ex Rel.Indiana Supreme Court · 1929
- State ex rel. Board of Commissioners v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
- Hummer v. School City of Hartford CityIndiana Court of Appeals · 1953
- City of Indianapolis v. KeeleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
- City of Marion v. AntrobusIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.