Chilcote v. San Bernardino County
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.
Ameliorating to some extent the rigor of the common-law rule that a public corporation exercising sovereign power may not be held liable for the torts of its officers and servants, the California legislature in 1923 (Stats. 1923, chap. 328, p. 675) enacted a law permitting such actions against counties, municipalities and school districts, where the injuries complained of resulted from defective conditions in streets, highways, buildings and grounds, where the governing board of such entity had knowledge or notice of such defective condition.
Later, in 1931, the legislature, by section 1714%…
2Cited by20 opinions
- Ladd v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Hernandez v. City of PomonaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Woodman v. Hemet Union High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Bates v. Escondido Union High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Willoughby v. ZylstraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.