Legal Opinion

D & M DEVELOPMENT CO. v. Sherwood and Roberts, Inc.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1969No. 10366PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Justice.

The sole question of law presented by this appeal is whether a “commitment fee” or “brokerage fee” is to be defined as interest when it is contended that a lending arrangement carries interest in excess of the maximum permitted by our statute and is therefore usurious. We hold that such a fee does not constitute interest.

In this case extensive interrogatories, affidavits and depositions were taken, filed, and are a part of the record from the court below. Both parties filed motions for summary judgment stating that there were no material issues of fact for decision by the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Meridian Bowling Lanes, Inc. v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Eagle Rock Corp. v. Idamont Hotel Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1938
  3. West v. BrennerIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Altherr v. Wilshire Mortgage CorporationArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Easton v. Butterfield Live Stock Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1929

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Stedman v. Georgetown Savings & Loan Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Gonzales County Savings & Loan Ass'n v. FreemanTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Stedman v. GEORGETOWN S. & L. ASS'NTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Woodbridge Place Apartments v. Washington Square Capital, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  5. Fikes v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1975

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API