Cecil v. Allied Stores Corp.
Montana Supreme Court
1Per curiam
This is a class action by a revolving charge account customer against a retail department store seeking a declaratory judgment (1) that the Montana Retail Installment Sales Act is unconstitutional, or in the alternative (2) that the revolving charge account plan of the store violated the Act prior to its amendment in 1971, and (3) that relief should be granted to all revolving charge account customers of the store in the form of refunds of finance charges, punitive damages, attorney’s and accountant’s fees, interest and costs. The district court of the eighth judicial district, Cascade…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Hogg v. RuffnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
- Hafer v. SpaethWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- Sloan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
- State v. J. C. Penney Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Rutherford v. City of Great FallsMontana Supreme Court · 1939
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Turner v. Younker Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- E.C.A Environmental Management Services, Inc. v. ToenyesMontana Supreme Court · 1984
- Rangen, Inc. v. Valley Trout Farms, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
- Fox v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1979
- Western Auto Supply Co. v. VickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.