Freeman v. . Wilson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Civil Actios, tried before Moore, J., at Spring Term, 1815, of Bertie Superior Court, upon exceptions to the report of tbe referee, to whom the cause was referred to state an account of the defendant as guardian of the feme plaintiff, and the intestate of the plaintiff,' Freeman. The facts pertinent to the case as decided, are stated in the opinion of the court.
Read the full summary
Civil Actios, tried before Moore, J., at Spring Term, 1815, of Bertie Superior Court, upon exceptions to the report of tbe referee, to whom the cause was referred to state an account of the defendant as guardian of the feme plaintiff, and the intestate of the plaintiff,' Freeman. The facts pertinent to the case as decided, are stated in the opinion of the court. The exceptions were overruled, and judgment rendered in-favor of the plaintiffs ; and thereupon the defendants appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.
First exemption. The defendant was appointed guardian of the plaintiff in 1857. The referee does not state at what time he came to a settlement with the administrator of her father, and received from him the notes mentioned under the heads of the several exceptions. "We assume that he-did so soon after Ixis appointment.
In December, 1862, the defendant assigned or delivered to-one-Isaac Freeman a note made by Floyd, Pugh and Cotton,, and also one made by Walston, Pugh and Cotton, which he-held as guardian, and which together amounted to $3,425.30. in exchange he took the note of said Freeman…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Coggins v. . FlytheSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
- Coggins v. FlytheSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. DurrinWyoming Supreme Court · 1944